Question about allowed characters

So I am a pretty knew writer and still getting used to the quirks of this site. I saw every time while making a new story that bestiality, underage sex and extreme violence is not allowed which I am completely fine with and I think its fair. So the story I am currently writing is a fantasy adventure story similar to the games Corruption of Champions and Trials in Tainted Space if anyone has ever played any of those. I wanted some of the monsters to be based off of animals. Perhaps a werewolf, centaur, etc. I wanted to know if I strictly couldn't use animals or anything that would be part animal as well.

 

As long as the 'monster' is sapient and can give consent you're golden.

 

Why does it have to give consent?

 

Because rapists are evil and deserve to be repeatedly shot in the head with a .22 rifle?

 

I can't disagree, in fact let me get my gun and I'll join the firing squad. But if the comment was based on what you like / dislike to read? Then I think my comment was justified? Given the tone of most of my stories.

 

Parse my original statement carefully.

 

If it is some kind of weird alien or monster then you are fine.

Fucking a dog is not ok.

Fucking a werewolf is a-ok

 

As long as it has approximately average human intelligence and is an adult of its species...

 

Or a Robot, I've never been quite clear on what the rules are with robots...

 

Don't see any problems with robots as long as they don't appear underage.
(Ever seen a vibrator with programmed patterns?)

 

Yes, I know that, but that's kind of something that's been an issue I've wanted a clear answer about: Say you have a Fan Fiction detective story based on the world of "Questionable Content", alright? You have two detectives, one of whom is a robot and the other one's 'friend' under the Robot Friend Program thingy. Now, the robot switches chassis like a normal P.I. switches outfits and cars to do various surveillance work, and sometimes these involve full 'Adult Interaction' chassis, if you catch my drift: BUT this is the crux of my question: obviously there are no 'Adult Interaction' chassis of CHILDREN*, but under the site rules would the robot partner be disallowed from using a chassis that appears to be a child because they also use the 'Adult Interaction' chassis sometimes? It's the same character, who has had sex, the same mind and soul, in a body that APPEARS to be that of a child, even if no sexual content will be brought up while that body is present/being used: so, does that violate the standards of the site?
*(There would be, even if only illegal custom rigs sold on the dark web: but, site rules, which I agree with!)

 

A robot is actually not a character. Usually, artificial intelligence is based on algorithms which are created by the programmer, so even pretty good AI wouldn't make it a character.
That makes a robot a thing and you can use (!) things as you want.

Now, using an underage appearance (look and/or character) for any humanoid creature or humanoid robot during sexual activity would serve as underage content, so I would clearly see that as violating the underage rule.

So I don't think that it would be a problem if a shapeshifting character or transformable robot changes their look/behavior to appear underage as long as they aren't present or participate in any sexual activity.

But tbh, I don't think that it is really necessary to use such an appearance for a story. In most cases where it would be useful, you could probably use the appearance of a Chihuahua as well.

 

Which runs into the same issue just from bestiality...

 

Why?

 

Oh, yeah, right, forgot about the stories with human minds in dog bodies being considered 'okay'...

 

Well, in terms of your example, the Chihuahua (like an underage personae) wouldn't participate in sexual activities, so that wouldn't be bestiality at all.

 

True.

 

On the other hand, Chihuahua can't open doors...

 

The robot thing just made me think... actual real life sex robots aren't at the AI level to give consent.

In the 'Humans' tv series, a sexbot turned sentient revolted, and her perception of her previous existence was serial rape because she'd been technologically unable to deny consent. That was ok for tv, but not for site terms, eh?

*Not wanting to write about this. Purely intellectually piqued.

 

Um... actually there are speaking sex dolls who can deny consent depending on the behavior of the man. (Though that doesn't prevent the man from using it.)

Still a program

What wouldn't be ok for the site? A robot is not a person or animal.