AI Content Flair

[merkros]

While reading the thread about the new advertising trial involving AI Writing and considering the prevalence of AI Created or Assisted content on the site. I was wondering if there would be a way to implement an AI Content flair for stories that have AI content.

Functionally, it would be a togglable option in the Edit Story screen to acknowledge that yes, this story has or relies on AI content and it would put a little flair at the bottom corner of the cover art that would note the AI content.

My personal recommendation is to have two separate ones for AI Art and AI Writing as some writers do utilize AI Art in their stories, but not their Writing (and vice versa probably).


It would be impossible to force writers to use it, and as AI Content becomes more sophisticated, it will become harder to enforce. However, as someone who doesn't mind AI Content as long as it's clearly stated to be AI Content, I feel like it's an important consideration. Especially for writers who may want to be transparent that their AI Content is AI...and In a broader sense, it could be rolled into a separate option sometime in the future that allows readers to hide stories with AI Content if they do not want to see it. (assuming that writers declare their story to have AI Content in it properly...which i mean, people can't even use tags right so maybe I'm a bit too idealistic, but i digress)

 

[OccasionalReader]

It would be impossible to force writers to use it, and as AI Content becomes more sophisticated, it will become harder to enforce. However, as someone who doesn't mind AI Content as long as it's clearly stated to be AI Content, I feel like it's an important consideration. Especially for writers who may want to be transparent that their AI Content is AI...and In a broader sense, it could be rolled into a separate option sometime in the future that allows readers to hide stories with AI Content if they do not want to see it. (assuming that writers declare their story to have AI Content in it properly...which i mean, people can't even use tags right so maybe I'm a bit too idealistic, but i digress)

Seconded on the idea

But also AI in its current concept will never be able to pass as fully human - it will always have a tell, so to speak. It will get very very good at masking the tells eventually, but simply put, generative AI is the wrong path to creating genuine AI. Several paths are possible for singularity, but generative AI is a false vacuum so to speak as far as AI goes - as long as scientists pursue it as the end all be all, they're at a state of finality. I expect us to reach the peak on generative AI roughly ten years from now. Meanwhile, singularity using other fields of AI is roughly five years out should we focus on them, whereas the reality is that under current focus we won't reach any of them for at least a century.