AlexandraS90
Really Experienced
Maybe this is my inner Forrest MacNeil talking, but I think the more I write about my fantasy cocaine equivalent, the more I should actually go out and you know, try the stuff.
There’s definitely some fantasies that are perhaps better not actually experiencing in real life. No matter how much you fantasize about meth or prison, they’re only glorious until you actually get involved and then you end up screwed.Maybe this is my inner Forrest MacNeil talking, but I think the more I write about my fantasy cocaine equivalent, the more I should actually go out and you know, try the stuff.
There’s definitely some fantasies that are perhaps better not actually experiencing in real life. No matter how much you fantasize about meth or prison, they’re only glorious until you actually get involved and then you end up screwed.
I dont know, I've stopped watching plenty of movies halfway through that would suggest cocaine is a pretty wild time.
I don't think it has to be interacting. Just observing should be sufficient.interacting with other people.
In published works, dialogs are usually different from the way humans speak as well.Much of the dialogue I read on CHYOA bears no similarity to the way actual humans speak.
Look, I'm writing a non-con story. Some creative liberties have to be taken.Worse is the behaviour of characters, where everyone except perhaps the main character seem to act and make decisions unlike any sane person in real life.
Shakespeare has most of his characters speaking in rhyming iambic pentameter which I very rarely hear in real life conversational speech. My stuff is much more realistic than that!I don't think it has to be interacting. Just observing should be sufficient.
In published works, dialogs are usually different from the way humans speak as well.
It's usually reduced to the necessary information. The grammar would be rather like you write and less conversational speech.
Though dialogs on CHYOA are different in a different way.
Even after majoring in English, I still don’t understand iambic pentameter. Something about lots of stress and unstress… sounds like yoga tbh. But also if characters in books and movies and whatever talked liked people, we wouldn’t really be able to understand them because of the interrupted thought and short cuts people like to take when speaking. Especially when you’re dealing with people with ADD/ADHD who make zero sense 80% of the time they’re talking because the brain moves on so much faster than what they just said and now suddenly we’re talking about sex instead of food and then sex turns into drugs and then suddenly we’re in New York and it makes absolutely zero sense but we as humans understand it… or at least comprehend it, but when it’s written down on paper, it looks really bizarreShakespeare has most of his characters speaking in rhyming iambic pentameter which I very rarely hear in real life conversational speech. My stuff is much more realistic than that!
Definitely it isn’t enough to say I want to write like JK or I want to write like Riordan or I want to write like Shakespeare. You have to first understand WHY you like to read Rowling’s work or WHY Shakespeare is as revered as he is. What makes his plays so good? Or even simply if you just want to look at ASSTR or DeviantArt or Wattpad or even here on CHYOA and you find someone’s writing really good, figure out why? What makes their writing so appealing? Is it the way they describe scenes? The way they pace out an actual plot? Is it the emotions they convey? If so, how do you convey such emotions? It’s not enough to just copy, but to also understand why and how and how to replicate a style similar but not the same.Definitely lots of practice, in my opinion, but also reading other good works and deconstructing how good authors write goods stories from there. Sometimes I check online articles on how to write properly.
You're right. I read a lot of Hemingway a little while ago, and although I could see it was brilliant it took me a while to figure out why. One story I liked was "Big two hearted river". A quick summary of it is, a guy goes fishing for a couple of days and catches two fish. But shit the online critics read so much more into it like - you can see the narrator must have had a terrible war. Anyway, I tried deconstructing another of his stories and using the techniques and structure to write one of my own (non-erotic). Damn, but it was the best thing I've ever written. I was in tears finishing it.Definitely it isn’t enough to say I want to write like JK or I want to write like Riordan or I want to write like Shakespeare. You have to first understand WHY you like to read Rowling’s work or WHY Shakespeare is as revered as he is. What makes his plays so good? Or even simply if you just want to look at ASSTR or DeviantArt or Wattpad or even here on CHYOA and you find someone’s writing really good, figure out why? What makes their writing so appealing? Is it the way they describe scenes? The way they pace out an actual plot? Is it the emotions they convey? If so, how do you convey such emotions? It’s not enough to just copy, but to also understand why and how and how to replicate a style similar but not the same.
I've read more Tolkien's work in Lotr, but there's also a fair share of Warcraft and Warhammer novels I've read over the years, including some new series I've been trying like Throne of Glass. Tolkien's portraying of emotions and the scars of war is what strikes me deeply the most, and in Warcraft and Warhammer it's in the portrayal of gritty war scenes that get me riveted on my seat. What I like in Warcraft the most, however, is the sort of getting-to-the-point writing that doesn't splurge words on descriptions, and I find I prefer that kind of balance between emotional portrayal, description of the world and linear progression that keeps the reader absorbed.Definitely it isn’t enough to say I want to write like JK or I want to write like Riordan or I want to write like Shakespeare. You have to first understand WHY you like to read Rowling’s work or WHY Shakespeare is as revered as he is. What makes his plays so good? Or even simply if you just want to look at ASSTR or DeviantArt or Wattpad or even here on CHYOA and you find someone’s writing really good, figure out why? What makes their writing so appealing? Is it the way they describe scenes? The way they pace out an actual plot? Is it the emotions they convey? If so, how do you convey such emotions? It’s not enough to just copy, but to also understand why and how and how to replicate a style similar but not the same.
I agree that descriptions can at times feel not only like a waste of space sort of but also awkwardly placed. I mean, I tend to put all the information up front just because of the way the stories are usually formatted, but at the same time, does the protagonist really know by site that someone is 32DD? Or do they really know if someone is 6’2” by sight. It’s that type of stuff that is so obvious for the reader that it almost takes you out of the moment.I've read more Tolkien's work in Lotr, but there's also a fair share of Warcraft and Warhammer novels I've read over the years, including some new series I've been trying like Throne of Glass. Tolkien's portraying of emotions and the scars of war is what strikes me deeply the most, and in Warcraft and Warhammer it's in the portrayal of gritty war scenes that get me riveted on my seat. What I like in Warcraft the most, however, is the sort of getting-to-the-point writing that doesn't splurge words on descriptions, and I find I prefer that kind of balance between emotional portrayal, description of the world and linear progression that keeps the reader absorbed.
As such, when I write, I prefer to keep the description as concise and simple as possible but still interesting, so as to maintain an even pacing that doesn't feel draggy.
I've read more Tolkien's work in Lotr, but there's also a fair share of Warcraft and Warhammer novels I've read over the years, including some new series I've been trying like Throne of Glass. Tolkien's portraying of emotions and the scars of war is what strikes me deeply the most, and in Warcraft and Warhammer it's in the portrayal of gritty war scenes that get me riveted on my seat. What I like in Warcraft the most, however, is the sort of getting-to-the-point writing that doesn't splurge words on descriptions, and I find I prefer that kind of balance between emotional portrayal, description of the world and linear progression that keeps the reader absorbed.
As such, when I write, I prefer to keep the description as concise and simple as possible but still interesting, so as to maintain an even pacing that doesn't feel draggy.
I don't like when a story starts with complete character descriptions.put all the information up front just because of the way the stories are usually formatted
Even if the protagonist would be able to determine the perfect fit bra size of a woman doesn't mean that it is useful information for the reader. (As discussed in the bra size thread.)does the protagonist really know by site that someone is 32DD?