Easy? She blushed when getting identified. I give her down bad/10 on horny scale.
Yeah, going after her is easier and probably more fun too. But I'm not very good at that sort of thing.
Anyway, these "arguments". I might be more accommodating if you weren't inflicting harm on others, as if that will somehow convince anyone to follow you. But in this case I think the burden of proof lies firmly with you.
The one true god claims to be the only god in the tower, and of the three divine powers is the only one described as a god. That's it. So there is nothing else that could be called a god? Can you eliminate the possibility of any god existing anywhere in the tower (Lemiel, I know you want to object, but is OTG truly omniscient? If one of the other divine forces interfere could something reasonable able to be called a god be hidden from you?) If you can't then you cannot declare anything is
not a god based on just the existence of a god. You have confused an absence of evidence with evidence of absence. I also note that the sand mother never called herself a god.
You bring up two other gods. Although only one of those is a self styled. Liloth, for all the many things she is, didn't call herself a god, she was called that by others because of the actions she took and lost that title when her people believed she had betrayed them. Your argument that those called gods bring harm to their followers is by your own admission, wrong. So you lean heavily on the idea that anyone who calls themselves a god is deceptive or delusional. This might well be correct, but the sand mother didn't call herself a god, the same as Liloth, and the OTG although that is more ambiguous. So your key argument here isn't even relevant, a more relevant argument would be that those who are called God by other as a sign that their actions have benefited their followers thus earning the title.
You are now choosing to pick on the word "mother" saying it is not literally true. Really? OK, whatever. You have clearly never heard of adoption. Or learnt about many gods, they are often referred to with parental terms. It is quite normal for strong caring bonds to become parental in this way, perhaps the tower is short of examples but use voices can probably think of dozens each.
Huh, for a lot of talking you didn't make many points. If I may make an observation, a god is one that makes decisions for others. Given that the sand mother allows you to go free because you weren't harming her followers (interestingly trying to convince them she isn't a god is
not considered a harm), while you are willing to use any method to force you belief. Who is acting more like a God?
I'm sorry if this is a bit long, I tend to ramble when I make these sorts of arguments.